Is Perfume Parlour Poor Strong For Men a dupe of Diesel Bad Intense?

Bad Intense EDP

Diesel   Original Acquired

Poor Strong For Men EDP

Perfume Parlour   Inspired Statement
Share
Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
Bad Intense Eau de Parfum bottle Bad Intense EDP
EDP Concentration EDP
M Gender M
2017 Year 2017
££ Price Tier £
Poor Strong For Men Eau de Parfum bottle Poor Strong For Men EDP
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you
Check price on →
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you

Where they differ

Biggest gaps first. The bolder side leads.

ScentArt

View Liquid → Bad Intense EDP
View Liquid → Poor Strong For Men EDP

Which Should You Buy?

Our Verdict - Bad Intense EDP
Diesel Bad Intense is a surprisingly controversial scent that punches well above its weight in terms of performance and uniqueness. Polarising for sure, but a standout choice if you're chasing compliments and unafraid of its bold, savoury edge.
Acquired
Our Verdict - Poor Strong For Men EDP
A budget take on Diesel Bad Intense. The spicy cinnamon-nutmeg opening over a salty-musky caviar accord and sweet white tobacco captures the original's warm woody-amber pull; this dupe trims the marine-animalic edge and gives up much of Bad Intense's near-eternal longevity.
Statement

Scent Profile

How they compare
Bad Intense EDP A Poor Strong For Men EDP B
Where they part company by gap size

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
Bad Intense EDP
Poor Strong For Men EDP

Notes

Bad Intense
Poor Strong For Men

Heart Notes

Heart Notes

Base Notes

White Tobacco 52% Woody Notes 48%

Base Notes

White Tobacco 53% Woody Notes 47%
Shared Notes
Caviar 100% vs 100%
White Tobacco 51% vs 53%
Woody Notes 48% vs 46%
Nutmeg 39% vs 32%
Cinnamon 35% vs 35%
Bergamot 24% vs 32%
Shared Notes
Nutmeg 39% vs 32%
Cinnamon 35% vs 35%
Bergamot 24% vs 32%
Shared Notes
Caviar 100% vs 100%
Shared Notes
White Tobacco 51% vs 53%
Woody Notes 48% vs 46%

Note weights are our estimate from each note's place in the pyramid, not the share of the formula. Brands do not publish formulations.

Performance

Bad Intense Poor Strong For Men
Long (6-10h)
Longevity
Moderate (4-6h)
Strong
Projection
Intimate
Strong
Intensity
Moderate

Season and Occasion Fit

Bad Intense

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter

A cold-weather scent - best worn in winter and autumn.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Casual

Its immense sillage and longevity make it inappropriate for the office, but perfect for dates and nights out where its warm, spicy, and sensual character can shine. It's a casual evening scent, perhaps, but too dominant for formal events or sport.

Poor Strong For Men

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter

The warm spicy-woody amber with sweet tobacco is at its best in autumn and winter and feels too heavy for hot summer days.

Occasions

Best For:
Date
Also Works:
Office Casual Formal

A confident, cosy woody-amber that suits evenings, dates and daily wear, with enough warmth without overwhelming a relaxed setting.

Similarity Breakdown

Our estimate of how alike these two fragrances smell, calculated from their published notes. It is a position on our scale, not a measured percentage of shared smell.

Overall scent match
93%
Key Similarities

Every one of its 6 notes is in the original, including White Tobacco, Woody Notes, Cinnamon

Key Differences

Near-identical note list, differs in proportion

Where to buy

Pick a size. The two cheapest offers, then the rest.

Bad Intense EDP

Check price on →

No other shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.

Check price on →

Poor Strong For Men EDP

No shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.

Check price on Perfume Parlour →
Bad Intense EDP
Poor Strong For Men EDP
also worth checking

ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS