Is Dossier Musky Gaiac a dupe of Le Labo Gaiac 10 Tokyo?

Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP

Le Labo by Annick Menardo Original Favourite

Musky Gaiac EDP

Dossier   Inspired Favourite
Share
Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
Gaiac 10 Tokyo Eau de Parfum bottle Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP
EDP Concentration EDP
U Gender U
2008 Year 2021
£££££ Price Tier £
Musky Gaiac Eau de Parfum bottle Musky Gaiac EDP
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you
Check price on →
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you
Check price on →

Where they differ

Biggest gaps first. The bolder side leads.

ScentArt

View Liquid → Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP
View Liquid → Musky Gaiac EDP

Which Should You Buy?

Our Verdict - Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP
This isn't just a perfume; it's an intimate, woody whisper. Some find it a profoundly comforting musky embrace, while others are baffled by a surprising barbeque note. Love it or hate it, Gaiac 10 is undeniably unique and commands a fierce loyalty (and price tag) from its devotees.
Favourite
Our Verdict - Musky Gaiac EDP
This one's a bit of a chameleon, often hailed as a clean, woody skin scent, but don't be surprised if you catch an unexpected barbecue vibe. It's a divisive one, blending cozy musk with smoky woods, so definitely not a blind buy.
Favourite

Scent Profile

How they compare
Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP A Musky Gaiac EDP B
Where they part company by gap size

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP
Musky Gaiac EDP

Notes

Gaiac 10 Tokyo
Musky Gaiac

Top Notes

Base Notes

Base Notes

Shared Notes
Guaiac Wood 33% vs 56%
Musk 30% vs 100%
Cedar 19% vs 43%
Frankincense 16% vs 100%
Only in Musky Gaiac
Frankincense 100%
Shared Notes
Guaiac Wood 33% vs 56%
Cedar 19% vs 43%
Only in Gaiac 10 Tokyo
Musk 31% Frankincense 17%
Only in Musky Gaiac
Musk 100%

Note weights are our estimate from each note's place in the pyramid, not the share of the formula. Brands do not publish formulations.

Performance

Gaiac 10 Tokyo Musky Gaiac
Moderate (4-6h)
Longevity
Moderate (4-6h)
Moderate
Projection
Moderate
Moderate
Intensity
Moderate

Season and Occasion Fit

Gaiac 10 Tokyo

Seasons

Best For:
Spring Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Summer

Versatile across every season - no clear seasonal preference from wearers.

Occasions

Best For:
Office Date Casual
Also Works:
Formal

Its intimate sillage and clean, woody-musky profile make it perfect for office, casual, and date settings where subtlety is key. The high price point and low projection mean it's less suited for loud formal events or active sport.

Musky Gaiac

Seasons

Best For:
Spring Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Summer

Versatile across every season - no clear seasonal preference from wearers.

Occasions

Best For:
Office Casual
Also Works:
Date

Its generally soft sillage and skin-scent nature, combined with clean woody accords, make it ideal for office wear and casual settings where you don't want to overwhelm. It's less suited for formal events or sport due to its subtle presence and cozy, rather than energetic, profile.

Similarity Breakdown

Our estimate of how alike these two fragrances smell, calculated from their published notes. It is a position on our scale, not a measured percentage of shared smell.

Overall scent match
86%
Key Similarities

Every one of its 4 notes is in the original, including Musk, Cedar, Guaiac Wood

Key Differences

Near-identical note list, differs in proportion

Where to buy

Pick a size. The two cheapest offers, then the rest.

Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP

Check price on →

No other shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.

Check price on →

Musky Gaiac EDP

Check price on →

No other shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.

Check price on →
Gaiac 10 Tokyo EDP
Musky Gaiac EDP
also worth checking

ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS