Is Blossom Perfumery 232 F*cking Fabulous a dupe of Tom Ford Fabulous?

Fabulous EDP

Tom Ford by Shyamala Maisondieu Original Statement

232 F*cking Fabulous EDP

Blossom Perfumery   Inspired Statement
Share
Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
Fabulous Eau de Parfum bottle Fabulous EDP
EDP Concentration EDP
U Gender U
2017 Year -
£££££ Price Tier £
232 F*cking Fabulous Eau de Parfum bottle 232 F*cking Fabulous EDP
$445.19+ tax from
3.4 fl oz (100 ml) at FragranceNet
Buy Fabulous Check price on →
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you
Check price on →

Where they differ

Biggest gaps first. The bolder side leads.

ScentArt

View Liquid → Fabulous EDP
View Liquid → 232 F*cking Fabulous EDP

Which Should You Buy?

Our Verdict - Fabulous EDP
Divisive, polarising, and impossible to ignore. Some find it a masterpiece of complex leathery sophistication, others a medicinal baby wipe nightmare. It's truly a love-it-or-hate-it scent that backs up its bold name.
Statement
Our Verdict - 232 F*cking Fabulous EDP
No. 232 leans hard into Tom Ford's Fucking Fabulous leather-and-lavender signature but plays it flatter and louder, with a cheaper, sweeter almond opening and a base that fades faster than the original's brooding, long-lived leather trail.
Statement

Scent Profile

How they compare
Fabulous EDP A 232 F*cking Fabulous EDP B
Where they part company by gap size

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
Fabulous EDP
232 F*cking Fabulous EDP

Notes

Shared Notes
Lavender 52% vs 55%
Clary Sage 47% vs 44%
Tonka Bean 32% vs 25%
Leather 31% vs 34%
Almond 29% vs 25%
Cashmeran 24% vs 16%
Vanilla 20% vs 21%
Amber 20% vs 13%
Iris 18% vs 18%
Only in Fabulous
Woody Notes 23%
Only in 232 F*cking Fabulous
White Woods 17%
Shared Notes
Lavender 52% vs 55%
Clary Sage 47% vs 44%
Shared Notes
Leather 31% vs 34%
Almond 29% vs 25%
Vanilla 20% vs 21%
Iris 18% vs 18%
Shared Notes
Tonka Bean 32% vs 25%
Cashmeran 24% vs 16%
Amber 20% vs 13%
Only in Fabulous
Woody Notes 23%
Only in 232 F*cking Fabulous
Leather 28% White Woods 17%

Note weights are our estimate from each note's place in the pyramid, not the share of the formula. Brands do not publish formulations.

Performance

Fabulous 232 F*cking Fabulous
Moderate (4-6h)
Longevity
Moderate (4-6h)
Moderate
Projection
Moderate
Moderate
Intensity
Moderate

Season and Occasion Fit

Fabulous

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Spring

A cold-weather scent - best worn in winter and autumn.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Formal
Also Works:
Casual

Given its strong sillage and intense, luxurious profile, this is best suited for evening occasions like dates or formal events. It's too bold and potentially distracting for an office environment, and definitely not a gym scent.

232 F*cking Fabulous

Seasons

Best For:
Spring Autumn Winter

Community season votes for Tom Ford Fucking Fabulous, the fragrance this is built to match, favour spring, autumn and winter.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Formal
Also Works:
Casual

Wearers put Tom Ford Fucking Fabulous, the fragrance this is built to match, at its best for date nights and formal occasions.

Similarity Breakdown

Our estimate of how alike these two fragrances smell, calculated from their published notes. It is a position on our scale, not a measured percentage of shared smell.

Overall scent match
91%
Key Similarities

Shares 9 of its 10 notes, including Tonka Bean, Vanilla, Leather

Key Differences

Adds white woods, drops woody notes

Where to buy

Fabulous EDP
232 F*cking Fabulous EDP

Pick a size. The two cheapest offers, then the rest.

232 F*cking Fabulous EDP

Check price on →

No other shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.

1.7 fl oz (50 ml)
Not available

Prices before sales tax, which the shop adds at checkout.

ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS