Is Perfume Parlour Mountainous a dupe of Rabanne Olympéa?

Olympéa EDP

Rabanne by Anne Flipo, Paul Guerlain Original Statement

Mountainous EDP

Perfume Parlour   Inspired Statement
Share
Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
Olympéa Eau de Parfum bottle Olympéa EDP
EDP Concentration EDP
F Gender M
2015 Year 2015
££ Price Tier £
Mountainous Eau de Parfum bottle Mountainous EDP
$59.89+ tax from
1.0 fl oz (30 ml) at eCosmetics
Best value $24.38/fl oz (2.7 fl oz (80 ml))
Buy Olympéa Check price on →
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you

Where they differ

Biggest gaps first. The bolder side leads.

ScentArt

View Liquid → Olympéa EDP
View Liquid → Mountainous EDP

Which Should You Buy?

Our Verdict - Olympéa EDP
Modern goddess energy in a bottle - Olympéa EDP radiates creamy vanilla, opulent florals, and a softly spicy warmth. Seductive but poised, it's a signature for women who command attention with style and grace.
Statement
Our Verdict - Mountainous EDP
A budget riff on Paco Rabanne Olympea and its addictive salty-vanilla accord. Mountainous lands the creamy vanilla-and-salt heart that made the original a hit, but the white-floral and ambergris facets read flatter, and it projects more modestly than Olympea's famous trail.
Statement

Scent Profile

How they compare
Olympéa EDP A Mountainous EDP B
Where they part company by gap size

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
Olympéa EDP
Mountainous EDP

Notes

Shared Notes
Vanilla 52% vs 52%
Salt 47% vs 47%
Ginger 38% vs 27%
Ambergris 33% vs 34%
Mandarin 31% vs 35%
Jasmine 29% vs 37%
Sandalwood 26% vs 34%
Only in Olympéa
Cashmeran 40%
Only in Mountainous
Cashmere Wood 31%
Shared Notes
Ginger 38% vs 27%
Mandarin 31% vs 35%
Jasmine 29% vs 37%
Shared Notes
Vanilla 52% vs 52%
Salt 47% vs 47%
Shared Notes
Ambergris 33% vs 34%
Sandalwood 26% vs 34%
Only in Olympéa
Cashmeran 40%
Only in Mountainous
Cashmere Wood 31%

Note weights are our estimate from each note's place in the pyramid, not the share of the formula. Brands do not publish formulations.

Performance

Olympéa Mountainous
Long (6-10h)
Longevity
Short (2-4h)
Moderate
Projection
Moderate
Strong
Intensity
Moderate

Season and Occasion Fit

Olympéa

Seasons

Best For:
Spring Autumn
Also Works:
Summer Winter

The lush white florals and warm vanilla-amber base suit both mild and cooler weather, excelling in spring and fall when its richness and spice feel uplifting but not overwhelming. It remains wearable in winter with its cozy sweetness, but may feel too intense for peak summer heat.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Casual
Also Works:
Office Formal

Olympéa EDP's moderate projection and seductive, creamy floral-vanilla signature make it perfect for dates, evenings out, or stylish everyday wear. It is elegant enough for formal events, but may become too pronounced for sports or very close-quarters office settings.

Mountainous

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Spring

The warm salty-vanilla and creamy woods suit cooler autumn and winter wear, with enough freshness up top to work in spring.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Casual
Also Works:
Formal

Sweet, sensual and a little bold, it shines on dates and evenings more than the office or sport.

Similarity Breakdown

Our estimate of how alike these two fragrances smell, calculated from their published notes. It is a position on our scale, not a measured percentage of shared smell.

Overall scent match
92%
Key Similarities

Shares 7 of its 8 notes, including Salt, Mandarin, Ginger

Key Differences

Adds cashmere wood, drops cashmeran

Where to buy

Olympéa EDP
Mountainous EDP

Pick a size. The two cheapest offers, then the rest.

Mountainous EDP

No shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.


Prices before sales tax, which the shop adds at checkout.

ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS