Is Perfume Parlour Gardens Park For Women a dupe of Fred Hayman 273 Rodeo Drive?

273 Rodeo Drive EDT

Fred Hayman   Original Acquired

Gardens Park For Women EDP

Perfume Parlour   Inspired Favourite
Share
Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
273 Rodeo Drive Eau de Toilette bottle 273 Rodeo Drive EDT
EDT Concentration EDP
F Gender F
1989 Year -
££ Price Tier £
Gardens Park For Women Eau de Parfum bottle Gardens Park For Women EDP
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you
Check price on →
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you

Where they differ

Biggest gaps first. The bolder side leads.

ScentArt

View Liquid → 273 Rodeo Drive EDT
View Liquid → Gardens Park For Women EDP

Which Should You Buy?

Our Verdict - 273 Rodeo Drive EDT
This 80s powerhouse is a love-it-or-hate-it affair. Expect massive throwback vibes, intoxicating tuberose, and fruits that are anything but shy. It's a loud, proud blast from the past, not for the faint-hearted.
Acquired
Our Verdict - Gardens Park For Women EDP
Perfume Parlour's affordable interpretation of Beverley Hills 273 - a floral fragrance led by Orange Blossom, Bergamot, with citrus depth. It captures the gist of the original at a fraction of the cost, rendering a touch simpler and quieter.
Favourite

Scent Profile

How they compare
273 Rodeo Drive EDT A Gardens Park For Women EDP B
Where they part company by gap size

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
273 Rodeo Drive EDT
Gardens Park For Women EDP

Notes

Shared Notes
Amber Amber 22% vs 23%
Sandalwood Sandalwood 21% vs 30%
Gardenia Gardenia 20% vs 33%
Peach Peach 20% vs 38%
Vetiver Vetiver 16% vs 19%
Only in 273 Rodeo Drive
Apricot Apricot 38% Ylang-Ylang Ylang-Ylang 36% Iris Iris 26%
Only in Gardens Park For Women
Peach Peach 38% Gardenia Gardenia 33% Rose Rose 28%
Shared Notes
Amber Amber 22% vs 23%
Sandalwood Sandalwood 21% vs 30%
Vetiver Vetiver 16% vs 19%
Only in 273 Rodeo Drive
Spicy Notes Spicy Notes 22% Cedar Cedar 17%
Only in Gardens Park For Women
Vanilla Vanilla 27%

Note weights are our estimate from each note's place in the pyramid, not the share of the formula. Brands do not publish formulations.

Performance

273 Rodeo Drive Gardens Park For Women
Long (6-10h)
Longevity
Short (2-4h)
Strong
Projection
Intimate
Strong
Intensity
Moderate

Season and Occasion Fit

273 Rodeo Drive

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Spring Summer

Versatile across every season - no clear seasonal preference from wearers.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Formal
Also Works:
Casual

Given its strong sillage and longevity, this isn't suitable for office wear, as reviews frequently mention its 'powerhouse' nature. It shines on dates and formal evenings, where its bold character and 'sexy' aura can be appreciated without overwhelming others. It's too heavy for sport.

Gardens Park For Women

Seasons

Best For:
Spring Summer

The floral character is happiest in spring and summer - the freshness reads bright and clean in milder weather; the dupe's lighter build means it can struggle to project in the opposite season.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Casual
Also Works:
Office Sport

Its floral, citrus signature leans toward casual and daily wear - approachable enough for date use without overwhelming a room.

Similarity Breakdown

Our estimate of how alike these two fragrances smell, calculated from their published notes. It is a position on our scale, not a measured percentage of shared smell.

Overall scent match
34%
Key Similarities

Shares 5 of its 13 notes, including Gardenia, Amber, Sandalwood

Key Differences

Adds apricot and cedar, drops bergamot and orange blossom

Where to buy

273 Rodeo Drive EDT
Gardens Park For Women EDP
No price data

ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS