Is One Pure Drop Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense a dupe of Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense?

Oud Wood Intense EDP

Tom Ford by Richard Herpin Original Acquired

Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil

One Pure Drop   Inspired Statement
Share
Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
Oud Wood Intense Eau de Parfum bottle Oud Wood Intense EDP
EDP Concentration Oil
U Gender U
2017 Year -
££ Price Tier £
Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Perfume Oil bottle Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you
Check price on →
No stockist yet
We have not found it at a shop we track that delivers to you
Check price on →

Where they differ

Biggest gaps first. The bolder side leads.

ScentArt

View Liquid → Oud Wood Intense EDP
View Liquid → Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil

Which Should You Buy?

Our Verdict - Oud Wood Intense EDP
Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense is a bold, divisive beast that's definitely not for the faint-hearted. It’s a love-it-or-hate-it scent with a cult following, often described as fiercely masculine and unapologetic.
Acquired
Our Verdict - Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil
A leaner, sweeter take on Tom Ford's Oud Wood Intense. The smoky oud-and-leather core survives the translation to oil, but the original's aromatic castoreum grip and dry cypress edge get replaced with a simpler amber warmth.
Statement

Scent Profile

How they compare
Oud Wood Intense EDP A Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil B
Where they part company by gap size

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
Oud Wood Intense EDP
Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil

Notes

Shared Notes
Oud Oud 100% vs 55%
Cypress Cypress 50% vs 27%
Only in Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense
Ginger Ginger 40% Cardamom Cardamom 33% Juniper Juniper 27%
Shared Notes
Cypress Cypress 50% vs 27%
Only in Oud Wood Intense
Angelica Angelica 50%
Only in Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense
Oud Oud 56% Rose Rose 17%
Only in Oud Wood Intense
Oud Oud 100%
Only in Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense
Leather Leather 37% Amber Amber 32% Sandalwood Sandalwood 32%

Note weights are our estimate from each note's place in the pyramid, not the share of the formula. Brands do not publish formulations.

Performance

Oud Wood Intense Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense
Long (6-10h)
Longevity
Moderate (4-6h)
Strong
Projection
Intimate
Strong
Intensity
Moderate

Season and Occasion Fit

Oud Wood Intense

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter

A cold-weather scent - best worn in winter and autumn.

Occasions

Best For:
Date
Also Works:
Formal

This fragrance is an absolute powerhouse in both longevity and sillage, making it too overwhelming for an office environment. Its intense, animalic, and leathery profile is best reserved for formal events or a confident statement on a date night rather than casual wear or sport.

Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter

The warm woody-leather base wants cold-weather layering; the oil's low projection makes it too subtle to compete with summer heat and sweat.

Occasions

Best For:
Date
Also Works:
Casual Formal

Smoky and warm enough for an evening date or a formal dinner, casual enough to dab on for an autumn walk, but not built for the gym.

Similarity Breakdown

Our estimate of how alike these two fragrances smell, calculated from their published notes. It is a position on our scale, not a measured percentage of shared smell.

Overall scent match
72%
Key Similarities

Shares 2 of its 9 notes, including Cypress, Oud

Key Differences

Adds amber and cardamom, drops angelica

Where to buy

Oud Wood Intense EDP
Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil

Pick a size. The two cheapest offers, then the rest.

Oud Wood Intense EDP

Check price on →

No other shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.

Tom Ford Oud Wood Intense Oil

Check price on →

No other shop we track that delivers to you has it in stock.


ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS