Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
Vanderbilt Eau de Toilette bottle Vanderbilt EDT
EDT Concentration EDP
F Gender F
1982 Year 1977
£ Price Tier ££
Charles of the Ritz Eau de Parfum bottle Charles of the Ritz EDP

ScentArt

View Liquid → Vanderbilt EDT
View Liquid → Charles of the Ritz EDP

Which Should You Buy?

Our Verdict - Vanderbilt EDT
Divisive, nostalgic, and a surprisingly complex cheapie, Vanderbilt is a love-it-or-hate-it classic that punches well above its price point. Reformulations mean vintage is often preferred, but many still adore modern versions.
Favourite
Our Verdict - Charles of the Ritz EDP
A lost icon, Charles of the Ritz is a powerful, elegant floral amber that evokes deep nostalgia for those who remember it. It's a divisive scent, but undeniably a classic that many still desperately try to track down.
Acquired

Scent Profile

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
Vanderbilt EDT
Charles of the Ritz EDP

Notes

Shared Notes
Aldehydes 26% vs 30%
Orange Blossom 16% vs 17%
Pineapple 16% vs 16%
Bergamot 13% vs 19%
Only in Vanderbilt
Lavender 15% Green 13%
Only in Charles of the Ritz
Lemon 16%
Shared Notes
Carnation 21% vs 14%
Tuberose 19% vs 14%
Ylang-Ylang 18% vs 16%
Orris 14% vs 13%
Jasmine 13% vs 13%
Rose 11% vs 15%
Only in Charles of the Ritz
Lilac 13%
Shared Notes
Vanilla 19% vs 12%
Cinnamon 15% vs 12%
Musk 12% vs 12%
Vetiver 11% vs 11%

Accords

Vanderbilt Charles of the Ritz
100%
White Floral
82%
Amber
100%
83%
Floral
91%
90%
Warm Spicy
75%
87%
Sweet
66%
86%
Woody
85%
80%
Powdery
71%
76%
Aldehydic
62%
69%
Tuberose
67%
Yellow Floral
65%
66%
Vanilla
Fresh
64%
White Floral shared
100%
82%
100%
Floral shared
83%
91%
Warm Spicy shared
90%
75%
Sweet shared
87%
66%
Woody shared
86%
85%
Powdery shared
80%
71%
Aldehydic shared
76%
62%
69%
Yellow Floral shared
67%
65%
66%
64%

Performance

Vanderbilt Charles of the Ritz
Moderate (4-6h)
Longevity
Long (6-10h)
Moderate
Projection
Strong
Moderate
Intensity
Strong

Season and Occasion Fit

Vanderbilt

Seasons

Best For:
Spring Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Summer

Versatile across every season - no clear seasonal preference from wearers.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Casual Formal
Also Works:
Office

Its moderate sillage and comforting nature make it suitable for various occasions, though its floral-spicy warmth leans more towards dressed-up casual or romantic evenings rather than active sports. Many find it office-appropriate due to its clean character, but a strong initial aldehyde blast might be too much for some work environments.

Charles of the Ritz

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Spring Summer

Versatile across every season - no clear seasonal preference from wearers.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Formal

Given its enormous sillage and longevity, this is definitely not an office-friendly scent in its original form. It shines best in formal settings or during romantic evenings where its powerful presence can be appreciated without overwhelming a small space.

Similarity Breakdown

How alike these two fragrances smell, scored from their full scent profiles.

Overall scent match
90%
Key Similarities

Both lean white floral, warm spicy, sweet

Key Differences

Subtle differences in overall composition

Where to buy

Vanderbilt EDT
Charles of the Ritz EDP
also worth checking

ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS