Is Milton-Lloyd True Grit a dupe of Dior Sauvage?

Sauvage EDT

Dior by François Demachy Original
55%

True Grit EDP

Milton-Lloyd   Dupe
Card A shareable image comparing these two fragrances - verdicts, profiles and what they share. Save or copy it to post anywhere.
Sauvage Eau de Toilette bottle Sauvage EDT
EDT Concentration EDP
M Gender M
2015 Year -
££ Price Tier £
True Grit Eau de Parfum bottle True Grit EDP
Our Verdict

Sauvage is the sharper, more polished choice; True Grit is the value play for anyone chasing the same crowd-pleasing DNA at a fraction of the cost. Sauvage delivers that unmistakable ambroxan-fresh blast, with stronger projection and a more refined, premium feel. True Grit tracks the vibe closely but swaps some of that signature brightness for a slightly warmer, simpler take, one that feels less vivid and less luxurious. Sauvage wins if you want the fragrance people instantly recognise and remember. True Grit is the smarter buy if you care more about the scent profile than the prestige, and price matters most.

ScentArt

View Liquid → Sauvage EDT
View Liquid → True Grit EDP

Which Should You Buy?

Choose Sauvage if...
  • You want the original, not a clone.
  • You prefer a brighter, more vivid opening.
  • You care about stronger premium polish.
  • You want the most recognisable version.
Choose True Grit if...
  • You want Sauvage-like scent for less.
  • You care most about value per millilitre.
  • You like a warmer, slightly simpler take.
  • You want a safe, easy crowd-pleaser.
Our Verdict - Sauvage EDT
A modern classic with electrifying freshness and a bold, spicy signature. Instantly recognizable, its crisp citrus and ambroxan punch make it a go-to for those who want to be noticed and remembered.
Acquired
Our Verdict - True Grit EDP
This is a seriously impressive Sauvage clone, offering incredible value. Reviewers consistently praise its similarity to the high-end original, making it a firm crowd-pleaser for those seeking that popular scent profile without breaking the bank.
Acquired

Scent Profile

How They Wear

Showing: Overall Blend

Mood

Mood Energising
Calming
Character Playful
Serious
Sentiment Uplifting
Brooding
Sauvage EDT
True Grit EDP

Notes

Accords

Sauvage True Grit
60%
Amber
100%
Leather
93%
70%
Woody
87%
85%
Citrus
79%
80%
Aromatic
68%
Animalic
70%
Smoky
49%
Powdery
45%
38%
Musky
Amber shared
60%
100%
93%
Woody shared
70%
87%
Citrus shared
85%
79%
Aromatic shared
80%
68%
70%
49%
45%
38%

Performance

Sauvage True Grit
Long (6-10h)
Longevity
Long (6-10h)
Strong
Projection
Moderate
Strong
Intensity
Strong

Season and Occasion Fit

Sauvage

Seasons

Best For:
Spring Summer
Also Works:
Autumn

The crisp citrus opening and aromatic freshness make it ideal for spring and summer, while the spicy, woody, and amber base provides enough warmth for cooler autumn days. Its brightness can feel sharp in winter but remains versatile year-round.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Casual
Also Works:
Formal Sport

Vivid projection and freshness make it superb for casual, daytime, and outdoor settings, as well as sporty activities. Its assertive scent profile can be bold for close office quarters but works well for dates and informal evenings.

True Grit

Seasons

Best For:
Autumn Winter
Also Works:
Spring Summer

Versatile across every season - no clear seasonal preference from wearers.

Occasions

Best For:
Date Casual Sport
Also Works:
Office

Its fresh and energetic profile makes it a great everyday grab, perfect for casual wear or even the gym as noted by reviewers. While versatile, its strong projection, similar to Sauvage, might be a bit much for very formal or strict office environments.

Similarity Breakdown

How alike these two fragrances smell, scored from their full scent profiles.

Overall scent match
55%
Key Similarities

Both lean amber, woody, citrus

Key Differences

Adds ambroxan and bergamot, drops amber and coriander

Where to buy

Sauvage EDT
True Grit EDP
also worth checking

ScentVerdict earns a commission from purchases - this doesn't affect our verdicts.

Compare Another Pair

VS